Personal tools
You are here: Home Research Archived Research Modules AE Sept09 Conversations 7. Results, Evidence, Analysis, Discussion and Impact Sections of your dissertation

7. Results, Evidence, Analysis, Discussion and Impact Sections of your dissertation

This is a summary of what to do in the Results, Evidence, Analysis, Discussion and Impact Sections of your dissertation.

By now you should be clear about what data you will be collecting and have started to collect some.

The next stages are: -
•    The Evidence  - this is a portrait, display and description of your evidence
•    The Analysis of evidence - this is in the form of a discussion
•    Impact  - this is an account of

•    A. What you have learned

•    B. What difference you have made

Portraying the Evidence       

You will mainly be using text to describe the data you have collected. Also consider using:

o    Charts

o    Diagrams

The Analysis of Evidence

 

Guidance on the process of analysis is provided Here:

 

This outlines the description (which you should have in the methods section for the “Steps to analysing the data” including:

    Collating

    Immersion

    Coding

    Sorting

    Hypothesis testing

    Pattern identification.

 

You should evaluate - you need to show weighing up of the research.

    Sources of bias

    Descriptive Validity

    Explanatory Validity

    Reliability of the results

 

You should also

Weigh up the evidence

Verify the evidence

 

Impact

You need to systematically describe the impact of your scholarship:

Use Kirkpatrick’s classification (From http://www.businessballs.com/kirkpatricklearningevaluationmodel.htm)

 

•    Your learning: What new perspectives have been revealed to you?

•    Your practice: Changes to what you do

•    The learning experience of pupils: How has what pupils do and/or experienced changed?

•    The learning outcomes of pupils: To what extent have the standards achieved by pupils been affected?

•    The practice of colleagues or of the school.

 

 

Please  let us know how things are  by commenting and sharing your findings here.
Document Actions

hand in date

Posted by Morag Scally at Mar 06, 2010 05:47 PM
Hi Alison

May the 6th Hand in? I was under the impression it was Sept.

Please would you clarify. Thanks Morag

Hand in date

Posted by Morag Scally at Mar 17, 2010 08:24 PM
Hi Alison

Just to ask again, Is May 6th the hand in date for Sept 09 AE group?

Morag

Hand in date

Posted by marion craven at Mar 18, 2010 07:51 PM
Hi Morag,

I hope you are right. On my email it says that drafts for literature review/ methodology are needed by that kind of date.

How are you doing on yours?

Marion

Hand in date

Posted by Morag Scally at Apr 01, 2010 11:51 AM
Hi Marion, Yes its all going quite well, just tying up the loose ends really, how about you?

Morag

Hand in date

Posted by marion craven at Apr 10, 2010 04:04 PM
Hi Morag,

I have decided to take a break and I am in Crete for Easter. It has given me time to think and organise my mind. I know what I want to write but just deciding how to.

Marion

Hand in date

Posted by Ian at Apr 26, 2010 08:46 AM
Modules are a uear long. Your hand in date is September.

This is shown on the front page of the module where is shows Timeline
 and at

http://midwhebonline.org.uk/[…]/view

Hand in date

Posted by Alison Gee at May 17, 2010 02:13 PM
Yes, I have now changed this, the hand in date is September . .

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by Ian at Jun 15, 2010 05:23 PM
I hope the material at ttp://midwhebonline.org.uk/core-4-research-procedures-and-tools/core-5-analysing-data

add to your analysis section.

What do you think?

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by Gemma Hughes at Jun 16, 2010 03:33 PM
Hi Ian

The materials have really helped, thanks! In fact all the materials on this course have really helped me to understand what is expected and what i should include.

Gemma

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by peta griffiths at Jun 18, 2010 11:07 AM
hello ian
I found the sat session very useful in helping to straigthen out what needs to be done. There are still certain issues I am having trying to analyse the research
1. Categorising the research under particular headings.
2. Should we consider the literature review part of our data as it has hlped to shape decisions that I have made regarding trailling strategies and changes in my teaching
3. There seems to be an overlap between all thse sections 7 to 10, how rigid is it that we should stick to this
4. Also reaseach seesm to have been an ongoing process in the project and sometimes analysis and evaluation takes place not at the end but during the project as it is shaping decisions and ways forward throughout. How do we address this effectively?

Thanksagain

Peta

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by peta griffiths at Jun 18, 2010 11:45 AM
Ian
Just one more point relating to some of the bad practice points you brought up on the sat. You emphasised how impoartnt it is to back up your conclusions with evidence. Is it sufficient in a narrative to state see observations for example or should we quote from previous research text?
thanks
Peta

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by Ian at Jun 21, 2010 11:11 AM
You should refer back to the pages and sections in your own work which show the data to support your statements.

You should not worry too much about being repetitious if it advances the evidence-statement connection.

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by peta griffiths at Jun 22, 2010 10:59 AM
ian there are also points in the text in the one above that I want clarified pls

thanks

peta

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by Ian at Jul 12, 2010 02:08 PM
Not sure I undertand this .

In a narrative its important to describe data and referneces its source eg (Observation Number 1) or (Survey to parents) etc.

Only in the later exolanation, analysis and discussion shoul;d you back this up by reference to literture and published research.

Analysis: Taking it further

Posted by Ian at Jul 12, 2010 02:15 PM
If your narrative about action research- further action and further research occurs like that then that's OK.


You must though describe data and then explore explanation, analysis, how it relates to the literture and published findings as two separate parts. This may also be in cycles of action- research- description- analysis/exploration/explanation- leading to action.


Just dont mix up description of data with conjecture/judgement/exploration/explanation etc but deal separately


Jacqueline Asks

Posted by Ian at Jul 12, 2010 08:43 AM
 
Just one question please - should exemplar materials such as questionnaires or self esteem measures be put in the exemplar models section or in the appendices at the end ?
 
Thanks
 
Jacqueline

Jacqueline Asks

Posted by Ian at Jul 12, 2010 02:11 PM
Good question

The module guide describes the exemplar models of practice at the end of the literature review

This refers to the practice on which the research is built and needs to be justified as “effective best practice”

You are not talking about exemplar models but research tools and these need to be in the text of the procedures and methods of data collection.